Saturday, January 7, 2017

Toyota Concept-i wants to be your friend


  It will work on relationship-building with its human partner-owner

Toyota pulled the sheet off its new Concept-i in Las Vegas the day before CES opened, and we swear the car winked at us.

“Yes, it winks and blinks,” said a Toyota guy we know.
Then it did it again. And a message on the door lit up and said, “Hello.” The Concept-i was flirting. We’re calling HR.
Officially, the Concept-i is meant “… to foster a warm and friendly user experience.”
“Imagine if the vehicles of the future were friendly, and focused on you,” Toyota mused in a press release.
The idea is the Concept-i will use artificial intelligence to learn more about you and interact with you as necessary. That extends from noticing if you’re nodding off and then waking you up with a cold air-conditioned blast, to determining if you’re in a bad mood and then playing your favorite song to cheer you up.
“If you’re angry, it’ll remind you about someplace you drove in it that you liked,” the Toyota guy said.
So imagine the parking lot at Disneyland jammed with Concept-is. It would even talk to you.
“At the heart of Concept-i is a powerful AI (artificial intelligence) that learns with the driver to build a relationship that is meaningful and human,” Toyota said. “More than just driving patterns and schedules, the concept is designed to leverage multiple technologies to measure emotion, mapped against where and when the driver travels around the world. The combination gives Concept-i exceptional ability to use mobility to improve quality of life.”

The car can be either driven or set to autonomous operation. Or it could in theory -- the show car you see here needed to be pushed onto the stage. 

Read more here.
A source: autoweek.com

‘American Dreaming’ exhibit looks back at seven generations of Corvette


PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE ‘VETTES WILL BE SHOWN OFF AHEAD OF THE DETROIT AUTO SHOW


Ahead of the Detroit auto show -- and the unlikely but still possible reveal of the new Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 -- Detroit’s Scarab Club is hosting “American Dreaming, Corvette 7 Generations and Beyond.” Obviously, the event will celebrate every generation of Corvette we've seen since the car first launched in 1953. The event will also show off some surviving Corvette concept art, design students' visions of what a mid-engine Corvette could look like and vintage Corvette advertising art.
The exhibit is running from Jan. 4 to Feb. 18, but a reception will be held on Friday, Jan. 6 at 5 p.m. The reception will feature former General Motors designer Bill Porter ceremoniously signing one of the Scarab Club’s rafter beams.

If you happen to be in town for the Detroit auto show and you want to check out more than just the Cobo Center, this could be a good way to pass the time, even if you miss the reception. Friday's event, and the rest of the Scarab Club’s gallery, is free to the public. For more information about the gallery, check out the website here.


Read more here.
A source: autoweek.com

Thursday, January 5, 2017

2017 Infiniti QX30 Sport



Infiniti appears to be finding its voice again as a brand ostensibly focused on performance. As evidence, we present—of all things—its newest small crossover, the QX30, which was derived from the Mercedes-Benz GLA-class platform, itself a derivative of Benz’s CLA sedan. During our first drive of the 2017 Infiniti QX30 last year, we were particularly impressed by the more athletic QX30 Sport. Now that we’ve gotten a chance to strap our test equipment to one, we have the numbers to support those initial impressions. This represents a bit of redemption for the QX30 after the all-wheel-drive model finished fourth out of five in a comparison test of baby luxo-crossovers.
While this model uses Mercedes structural and powertrain bits, Infiniti deserves some credit for making the $39,495 QX30 Sport model look and drive differently from the more lumbering QX30 AWD. The Sport label encompasses more than just spoilers and fancy wheels, as well it ought to for its hefty $8550 upcharge over the entry-level model. It gets the same 208 horsepower from the same turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four as other QX30 models (and GLA250s), but our front-wheel-drive Sport weighed nearly 200 pounds less than the all-wheel-drive edition that underwhelmed in the comparo. It also rides 0.8-inch closer to earth than the base front-drive version. That lowers the center of gravity enough to make it feel more like a hot hatchback than a shrunken SUV. Wheels grow from 18 to 19 inches in diameter and are shod with more aggressive Goodyear run-flat performance tires versus the AWD model’s all-season rubber. As in all QX30s, the transmission is a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. While none of the Sport model’s cosmetic touches nor its aggressively contoured sport seats make it a better performer, each adds a measure of engagement to the experiences of approaching, entering, and interacting with the car. It’s a different animal.
Frisky Critter
For one thing, it’s a quicker animal. Compared with the AWD model, the QX30 Sport’s acceleration from rest to 60 mph dropped by nearly half a second, from 6.6 to 6.2 seconds, with 100 mph arriving 1.3 seconds sooner, at 16.8 seconds versus 18.1. The 5-to-60-mph rolling start time fell from 7.2 to 7.0 seconds while the 30-to-50-mph and 50-to-70-mph passing times are down by half a second each, to 2.9 and 4.2 seconds. It handles and stops better, too, clinging to the skidpad with an impressive 0.90 g of lateral grip, up from the AWD model’s ho-hum 0.83 g. Braking from 70 mph took 157 feet, six fewer than its more rugged counterpart.
Incidentally, the QX30 Sport beat the last Mercedes-Benz GLA250 we tested nearly as handily in every measure excepting the sprint to 60 mph, which the all-wheel-drive Benz performed 0.1 second quicker, thanks in part to a launch-control function not available on the Infiniti. Another competitor, the 10Best Cars–winning Volkswagen GTI, is about a half-second quicker in most acceleration measures, but the Infiniti nearly matched the GTI’s tenacious 0.91 g on the skidpad and beat the GTI’s braking distance by two feet.
But numbers tell only part of the story: On the road, the QX30 Sport feels frisky and eager. The steering could use more feedback but is quick and direct, with linear responses and weighting that increases in concert with the driver’s ambitions. Stability at triple-digit speeds is remarkable for a small hatchback, and at lower velocities, torque steer has been effectively quashed. And the brakes—upgraded with cross-drilled front rotors—are utterly spectacular. All the while, the suspension is firm, if occasionally harsh.
Tuned to Play
While Mercedes-Benz provided Infiniti with quality bones, Stuttgart can’t be credited with bestowing the QX30 Sport with the sum of its dynamic competence. Infiniti claims responsibility for the final tuning of pretty much everything tweakable, including dampers, bushings, springs, electrically assisted power steering, brake-pedal feel, wheel size and design, tire choices, and more.
Even the Benz-sourced powertrain was subject to Infiniti tailoring its throttle and transmission calibrations—much to our liking, too. It can feel a bit prone to lag in Eco mode, but the wild personality swings we called out on our first drive when switching between Eco and Sport modes appear to have been tamed. Sport mode still perks things up considerably and delivers barking, rev-matched downshifts, but the car no longer acts like a bucking bronco in Sport and a lazy sloth in Eco.
For visual pizzazz, Infiniti gives Sport models distinct bumpers and dark-chrome exhaust tips in addition to the aforementioned 19-inch wheels. Inside, the QX30 Sport’s ergonomically straightforward and subtle interior design lends itself well to sportification, including the fitment of handsome and supportive sport seats and liberal use of contrast-stitched faux suede on the seats, armrests, and dashboard. Automated parking assist, front and rear parking sensors, and a flat-bottom steering wheel are also standard fare. Car aficionados may amuse themselves hunting for components shared with the baby Benz—some are obvious, such as the engine start/stop button, the steering wheel, and the HVAC controls. Most non-car folks likely won’t notice nor care about those things, let alone the less evident sharing of seat frames and button backlighting, so long as it all looks and functions harmoniously. Which it does, mostly­—the weak points of the interior are conspicuously cheaper plastic used on the lower door and dash panels, plus the modest size of the cargo hold and the rather tall and upright rear seatback.
While our test car was a stripper, lacking even the no-cost options of a sunroof and navigation, we also had some seat time in one loaded up with the $1500 Sport Leather package (seats and dashboard trimmed in nappa leather, heated seats, black faux-suede headliner), the $1000 Sport LED package (LED ambient lighting, adaptive LED headlamps), and the $1200 Sport Technology package (blind-spot and lane-departure warning, forward emergency braking, automatic high-beams, adaptive cruise control). The no-cost sunroof and navigation options will appear on nearly every QX30 Sport coming to the U.S. from Infiniti’s Sunderland, U.K., assembly plant, according to an Infiniti spokesman. They were also on the QX30 we photographed for our earlier first-drive story.
Snappy as the Sport model is, we know the QX30 chassis can handle more power—witness the nutty, 355-hp Mercedes-AMG GLA45, which has gained 20 horsepower since our last test. We’re hoping Infiniti eventually trots out, say, a QX30 Red Sport model of similar potency. Remember, this is the company that brought us the trailblazing FX, and while the QX30 Sport may not be a purebred Infiniti like that model, it does seem cut from a similar cloth, Benz architecture or no.
A source: www.caranddriver.com

2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S Cabriolet PDK Automatic


Well, bless their hearts, as they might say around Porsche’s U.S. headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia. Porsche officially says the 2017 911 Carrera S cabriolet with the PDK automatic transmission and the Sport Chrono package can accelerate from zero to 60 mph in 3.9 seconds. But that number is way off. It takes just 3.2 seconds, according to our measurements. So polite Porsche is, feigning modesty like that.
Surely Porsche knows that its most powerful rear-wheel-drive ragtop 911 ever can outaccelerate many other sub-four-second cars such as the BMW i8 (3.6 seconds) and the Jaguar F-type R (3.5). The Germans may or may not have known—until now—that it could beat the far more powerful and expensive Ferrari California T (3.3 seconds), but according to our test equipment, it does. All Porsche would say is, “Our values are on the conservative side.” Of course they are. No one likes a braggart.
Feeling the Blue
Nor does this lovely Sapphire Blue Metallic Carrera S cabriolet shout too loudly about its general awesomeness. The only overtly aggressive visuals on our test car were the optional matte-black 20-inch RS Spyder Design wheels ($2370), which came wrapped in the same staggered-width Pirelli P Zero tires (245/45 up front and 305/30 in back) as the 580-hp Turbo S. Otherwise, it looks like pretty much every other Carrera convertible roaming the streets of Los Angeles, where this road test took place. And there are a lot of them here, although none could beat this car in a stoplight drag unless they’re late-model Turbos with a capital T, and even those aren’t much quicker.
However ubiquitous the 911 may be in L.A.—if exclusivity is high on your priorities, there are better ways to spend $145K—our cabriolet turned at least a few heads, mostly on account of its striking, glittering blue paint job. While nearly everyone had lots of love for the extra-cost ($710) paint color, few seemed to notice the new fascias, the inboard-located sport-exhaust tailpipes, or the vertical slots in the rear engine cover that denote this as a “991.2” model.
One notable exception was the driver of a Guards Red, manual-equipped 991.1 Carrera S cabriolet and his lovely blonde companion with whom we chatted during a side-by-side rush-hour slog down Sunset Boulevard—yes, it was such the L.A. moment. He asked if the mid-cycle changes represented true upgrades, and he wondered if the new 420-hp turbocharged 3.0-liter flat-six engine was as good as the 400-hp naturally aspirated 3.8-liter flat-six that was making such lovely noises behind him and whether he should “go PDK” on his next 911.

Questions Answered

Funny that he of all people should ask, since about four years ago, we tested a Guards Red 2013 991.1 Carrera S cabriolet with the seven-speed manual transmission that literally could have been his exact car, sans the blonde. In any case, we could sum up our answers to his questions with, “yes, yes, and one second.” We say yes to the first, because the 991.2 refresh for 2017 brought a better-realized and Apple CarPlay–enabled infotainment system, a 918-inspired steering wheel, and three-dimensional taillamps, among other items.
Another affirmative to his second question, because whether it’s the 370-hp Carrera or the 420-hp Carrera S, these new turbo 3.0-liter engines are spectacularly responsive, torquey, and sweet sounding all the way to their 7400-rpm redlines. And one needn’t keep them in the loftiest part of the rev range to exploit all their might, making them more tractable in daily use. There also are fuel-efficiency benefits of some 12 percent, according to Porsche, although those can prove elusive in real-world driving.
Finally, we’d answer the PDK question with “one second,” since that’s how much time, give or take a tenth, by which this test car bested the 2013 model’s zero-to-60-mph, 5-to-60-mph, and quarter-mile times. The 3.0-liter engine’s formidable 420 horsepower and 368 lb-ft of torque beat the 3.8-liter’s 400 and 325, with peak torque now available from 1700 rpm versus 5600 rpm for the old 3.8-liter. Incidentally, this car’s acceleration times are virtually identical to those of a 2017 Carrera 4S coupe we tested recently, which weighed an insignificant 32 pounds less but had the traction advantage of all-wheel drive. As with that car, however, we were not able to get anywhere close to the EPA’s 24-mpg combined rating; we managed only 14 mpg during our week in the droptop. Did we mention L.A. has a lot of traffic?
So the Carrera S cabriolet is really quick. And with 1.00 g of lateral grip, it really sticks, if not quite as tenaciously as some other Carreras we’ve tested recently at up to 1.06 g’s. Braking to a halt from 70 mph was accomplished in an eyeball-popping 146 feet, right in the middle of the other 991.2 models we’ve tested. So much for the notion that going roofless necessarily degrades performance.
And doing so increases enjoyment of the car’s intoxicating aural soundtrack. Lower the roof on a warm evening—which can be done at up to 31 mph—and you’ll hear the flat-six’s mechanical symphony in full surround sound. Opting for the dual-mode sport exhaust, as on our test car, takes the experience to another level.

Top Goes Down, Price Goes Up

The dual-mode exhaust was part of a $6290 Sport package, which also included the Sport Chrono package, SportDesign side mirrors, a small-diameter GT Sport steering wheel, and four-wheel steering to sharpen handling at speed and to ease parking and maneuverability at low velocities. Other options included the $850 lane-change assist system, $2320 power front sport seats with 14-way adjustability, the $3850 extended leather package, the $3970 Premium Package Plus (heated and cooled front seats, keyless starting, LED headlamps, auto-dimming mirrors, and more). We’d have happily saved $955 by skipping this car’s cheesy blue-painted interior trim; ditto the $430 rear-footwell lighting. We’re not sure what it costs to replace a damaged front fascia, but it’s likely more than the $2590 front-axle lift system, so that option might be worthwhile.
All those upgrades piled on top of the PDK-equipped Carrera S cabriolet’s heady $119,950 base price resulted in a grand total of $144,805. That starting figure is $4900 grander than the 2016 version and $12,300 more than the coupe, which is a lot of coin for a retractable roof, no matter how wonderfully fitted and well insulated it is. Porsche may not like to boast, but it certainly isn’t shy with its pricing.
That said, this is the quickest rear-drive ragtop Porsche we’ve ever tested. And in California, where one doesn’t have to go far to find a tight canyon road to attack, the sensory enjoyment of top-down driving makes a strong case for a convertible, especially one as visceral as this.
A source: www.caranddriver.com

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

When you should walk away from a used Porsche 911

An inspection can change everything when you're trying to make a decision on a used 911



The Porsche 996-generation 911 is the cheapest way into Porsche’s rear-engine sports car, but it's still a Porsche, meaning ownership costs can be dangerous for your wallet.
While essentially every air-cooled 911 has been increasing in value as of late, the first water-cooled car, aka the 996 generation, keeps getting cheaper. This cheap price comes with some risk, so a prepurchase inspection similar to the one performed here is essential if you’re looking to snap one of these up on a budget.
Early 996s have the fatal intermediate shaft bearing (IMS) problem, which, if left unchecked, can cause thousands of dollars worth of damage to your bank account. The 911 being inspected in this video actually has a rear main seal leak, allowing oil to slowly escape over time.
When all was said and done, the shop performing the inspection estimated there was about $5,000 worth of repairs needed to make the car right. If it only costs $15,000 from the onset, you’re still looking at a relatively inexpensive 911, but if you're thinking the costs involved in 996 ownership end with the purchase price, this video should help clarify things. 

A source: autoweek.com

Faraday Future Unveils FF 91 Production Car in Las Vegas Before CES

But the larger question of whether Faraday has a future is still unanswered


 Although it still remains to be seen if it can cough up enough money to finish building its factory and to fund all the other things carmakers have to fund to build a car, potential electric car maker Faraday Future showed off its first production vehicle, in Las Vegas two nights before CES. The new, segment-busting luxury car/hatchback/wagon/crossover/SUV thingy is called the FF 91.
Looks are certainly subjective but this one is perhaps not what a reasonable person would call sexy. At least not as sexy as, say, a Tesla Model S or even a Lucid sedan. It looks a little more practical, like your date who has a “great personality.” Our first impression was that it looked like a 1980s Ford Ghia or Frua concept that had escaped from a car museum, an A-ha CD stuck on repeat in its audio system. But the FF 91’s shape gives it a cd of just 0.25 outside and loads of room inside, where it’s rated at 151 cubic feet.
The FF 91 has some other remarkable specs. Consider a 130-kWh battery (a Mitsubishi iMiEV electric car, by comparison, has a 16 kWh battery), big enough to give the car an EPA “adjusted” range of 378 miles. Cruise at a steady 55 mph and range goes up to 482 miles. 

There are three electric motors driving the awd 91, one in front and two in the rear. They are all 3-phase permanent magnet motors. Combined output is listed as 1050 hp, another remarkable spec. Two other measures are 783 kw and 1800 Nm. How much is that?
“That’s an insane amount,” said vp of propulsion engineering Peter Savagian.
Zero to 60 is listed at 2.39 seconds, which Faraday proved to the assembled masses Tuesday night in Las Vegas by launching everything from a Bentley Bentayga to a Ferrari 488 GTB just to show theirs was quicker. Interestingly, when Faraday flashed the 2.39 figure on the screen it showed that it was for a speed of 61.3 mph, suggesting that the FF 91 is even quicker than the listed 2.39 seconds to 60.
The FF 91 (pronounced nine one) is a sort of half-minivan, half-hatchback-looking thing with a pair of back seats aimed at making one or two executives very, very comfortable. So comfortable in fact that we have to think this car was made for and aimed at the Chinese market first. Back seats are important in China and other Asian markets where executives like to be driven around in style. Hence, many automakers that sell in China create special stretch versions of their luxo-sedans just for those guys. We got to sit in the back seat of this Faraday a few weeks ago at a press preview and didn’t want to leave the coddling, massaging confines of that rear seat.

“Noooo,” we moaned, like one of those fur-ball animals you see getting cuddled on YouTube videos. “Not yet.”
But the FF 91 is more than just a back seat. On that same press preview we were taken through all of Faraday Future’s many departments, and it takes a lot of them to build a car. Let’s go through each one. First we got the overview from Nick Sampson, senior vice president of vehicle, technology engineering and R&D.
“We don’t put ourselves across as an automobile company,” said Sampson. “We’re about extreme technology. We imagine ourselves in the future and what we’ll need. Our mission is to think and act and create in ways that most people can never imagine. Our vision is to liberate everyone to live and breathe freely.”
No small task, but that back seat’s a good start.
Sampson also spoke about the depth of Faraday’s product plans, which appear to be built on a single, modular platform.
“Faraday Future’s platform will be both two-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, with extended-range platforms and various power options,” Sampson said. “We’re using an intelligent modular approach to get a range of vehicles through variable platform architecture.”
He promised the new car would have “…the performance of a sports car whilst also having the agility and feel of a smaller car.”

Indeed, we got a ride in a 91 on an improvised autocross course and found it was very, very quick. You can do that with electric cars. But neither did it flop around in corners, though we did hear the outside front tire squealing during hard cornering. 
Next we heard from Angus Lock, senior manager of aeodynamics R&D.
“We wanted something that was both beautiful and aerodynamic,” Lock said. “Aerodynamics is important but you also have to take into consideration an effective cooling system. On the computer we could morph the shape to optimize drag, improve cooling or address any of several different aerodynamic properties.”
They’ve had FF 91 models on a 40-percent scale wind tunnel in Indianapolis and will move to a full-scale rolling road wind tunnel in North Carolina.
Meraj Ahmed, director of vehicle engineering, pointed out that Faraday uses CAE, computer-aided engineering, to meet all crash-test requirements for different markets around the world. We saw computer simulations of door intrusion crashes, roof crush tests and 35-mph frontal impacts. CAE also aids in reducing vibration, increasing torsional resistance and maintaining durability. So Faraday is in the modern world of car design.
Sohel Merchant, senior director of packaging and seating, showed us that back seat. If you can sit in one at an auto show, do it.
Hong Bae, director of ADAS and self-driving, showed us the pop-up LIDAR that will sprout from the hood when the Faraday Future is going in autonomous mode. The technology used for autonomous driving will include that 3D retractable LIDAR, 13 long- and short-range radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors and 10 high-definition cameras. Exactly when and at what level that autonomy will be deployed was not clear, but a valet parking mode, where you stop the car, get out and the car parks itself without you will be available “soon after launch,” Bae said. We saw a demo of it in the Faraday parking lot and yes, it parked itself. Unfortunately, another demo on Tuesday night took two tries to make the car drive forward on its own and park. Inside,
“It’ll be the most-connected vehicle on the market,” Merchant said. “It’ll have near-broadband connectivity. You can stream movies. Your Bluetooth phone will open the door as you approach the car. FFID carries your personal information regardless of where you sit in the car.”
The old-school glass rear-view mirrors will be replaced with a high-resolution mirror display. The heads up display will be “industry-leading.” Cameras at every seating position will recognize who’s sitting there for greater personalization of the driving or riding experience.
Now, all Faraday has to do is come up with enough cash to carry it all off. That subject was pretty much ignored Tuesday night before CES opened. But it will have to be addressed sooner or later. We hope sooner. This looks like it will be a success if they can just start making them.

A source: autoweek.com

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

McLaren 570GT vs Volkswagen Golf GTI vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate: road test of the year

McLaren 570GT vs Volkswagen Golf GTI vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate
Tasked with selecting their favourite car of 2016, our road testers each came up with something quite different, before heading to Wales to make their case

What a year for the car.

The past 12 months have produced a right-hand-drive Ford Mustang, a new, turbocharged generation of Porsche 911, the scandalously pretty Aston Martin DB11 and even an electrified –and electrifying – follow-up to the Honda NSX. What better way to celebrate 2016 than by simply picking our personal favourites and going for a two-day spin? We even found a Christmassy hook to hang it on, locating a Nasareth and Bethlehem, tiny villages both, at each end of Wales for the road test triumvirate to drive between.

In a year that variously featured the Ferrari 488 GTB, the Porsche 911 R, the quickest Tesla yet, the most powerful Caterham we’ve seen and the very first Bentley SUV, the contenders for such a pilgrimage were less than clear-cut. Naturally, we ignored all of the above, and thus we find ourselves in a car park on the foggy slopes of Snowdon with a Volkswagen Golf GTI minus its back seats, the spongier version of the McLaren 570S and probably the least popular variant of the new Mercedes-Benz E-Class Estate.
Wise? Well, possibly not so much. But we’ll make up for it with pluck – which is a good thing, considering that our arrival in north Wales has coincided with Storm Angus, a torrential weather front so brutally in its swing that we’ve started shooting photos on Snowdonia’s Pen-y-Pass in rain that is firing horizontal. I remain unconcerned, because I alone had the good sense to bring a car with a driven axle at the front – and one made by Volkswagen to boot, the firm second only to Land Rover at placing you in an apparently impenetrable bubble of dependability.
But to evoke that same sensation in a left-hand-drive Golf GTI with 306bhp on tap is no mean feat, and just one of the many reasons why the limited-edition Clubsport S was my personal favourite of 2016. The steering wheel’s cock-eyed placement is temporary, of course; it’s just that the first of 150 right-hand-drive examples bound for the UK were still to arrive when Nasareth beckoned.
Consequently, VW once again dispatched car 000 of 400 – the very machine we road tested back in August. Only the tyres have changed, Volkswagen wisely deducing that track-focused Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 rubber is probably the last thing you need at the fag end of the year in Wales. Consequently, our Golf now wears Pirelli P Zeros, and remarkably decent they are too – even when confronted by the 20mm of water that would be standing if it weren’t being whipped away from a peak long since lost to low cloud.

Dwelling on the tyres’ interaction with the road becomes a constant in conditions such as these, but in the Clubsport S’s case, that intimate relationship defines so much of what is extraordinarily good about the car. For a start, the way it deploys the 2.0-litre turbo engine’s power – slightly more of it even than in the Golf R, which gets to share it between both axles – is near to revelatory. There’s almost a total absence of torque steer, and when the wheels do occasionally spin under duress, it is in the cheerfully organic way they might if only 206bhp were being transmitted to the floor rather than the highest output yet fielded by a Golf GTI.
This facet alone, it being a product of the S’s finely fettled front end, would make the model seem properly sorted. But of course it is simply one wholly developed characteristic among many, the net result being a hot hatch not only assuredly brilliant in the usual snatched moments of fevered activity but also captivating in the much more mediocre business of moving pleasantly and easily between A and remote B.
The five hours spent with the Golf prior to Snowdonia were testament enough to that, where it benignly conquered the M25, the whole of the M40, the M42, the M6 Toll and the M54 in the uncannily calm and crisp manner of any other powerful, high-spec Golf. Then, with the day called early due to snapper Luc’s meteorological waterboarding and only the hotel to get to, some 70 miles south, the VW flicks a switch and immediately begins pummelling at the pleasure centres with throb and pop and clever gumption.

This occurs in a literal sense by engaging the car’s ‘Nordschleife’ setting (coyly hidden under Individual among the usual drive modes), a special state of tune that combines the engine’s maximum attack posture with the lithe steering and suspension set-up required to deal with the Nürburgring in record-breaking time. Unsurprisingly, this mixture of fizzing turbocharged four-pot spontaneity and terrifically supple wheel control proves to be just the thing for tackling 90 minutes of winding Welsh A and B-roads, and while the Clubsport S might not possess the tactility or virtuosity of the dearly departed Renault Mégane Cup S, it is more pliable, less reactive and probably a bit quicker for it.
The thing that clinched it for me, looking back over a year of driving the great and good, was that the car’s innate Golf-ness remains so obviously intact. Yes, the back seats and spare wheel have gone in the name of weight loss, but once you’ve ticked the no-cost option of putting the climate control back, you’ve got yourself that perfect thing: a useable, comfortable, refined hatchback with a 2.0-litre rocket motor attached. 
By the end of the first day I’d spent nearly 11 hours in it, with another 12 to go the next, and none of them induced discomfort, fidget, boredom or a desperate compulsion to get out or even swap. By the time I gave it back, only the jealousy of not being one of the 150 souls on the waiting list endured. What a car.
LEG TWO - ABERYSTWYTH TO LLYN BRIANNE

Do you know what you’re looking at when you’re looking at the cars of Matt Saunders and Nic Cackett? You’re looking at cars of men who order eggs Benedict for breakfast. That’s a rampantly exciting breakfast, that is. That’s a breakfast of exotic and expensive flavours. It involves cayenne pepper and lemon juice. It’s a breakfast that says: “I’m going to sit in a conference hall today. I’ve got a European hatchback or estate car outside. And my life needs revving up a bit.

Me? I take porridge, because outside is a McLaren 570GT and I don’t need an exciting breakfast to compensate, thank you very much; I just need one that slow feeds energy for a long trip ahead. You might think that a McLaren – even one wearing a GT badge – would be tiresome on a trip that, as Cackett has noted, will mean at least 12 hours behind the wheel for two consecutive days. And, yes, there are some cars, even GT cars, in which my back would agree with him – but the McLaren isn’t one of them. I’ve always known the driving position is good in a McLaren, but only when you subject it to a non-stop five-hour commute do you realise precisely how good it is. It’s dead straight, with a brake pedal that falls easily to either your left or right foot, as you prefer – and I don’t think there’s a car on sale with a more adjustable steering column (electrically so here).
The seats, electrically adjustable as standard and heated, obviously aren’t as wide or armchair-like as those in a Mercedes-Benz E-Class, but the fact that I don’t for one moment want to get out of the McLaren and into the refinement of the Mercedes tells you quite a lot about just how welcoming the 570GT is.

Unlike yesterday, today is – miraculously – pretty dry. It’s still cruddy on the ground, but as we head to the coast, it almost looks like it’s going to be a nice day. For Wales. In November. We cross a small bridge and drop down into a gravel car park overlooking the harbour. The drop would ground a lot of supercars, but there’s a standard nose lifter and the GT eases in with no bother and without causing too much drama, thanks to an exhaust that’s quieter than that of the 570S.
The thing about doing photo shoots in public places is that sometimes supercars can open doors for you and sometimes they just cheese people off with their noise and brightness, or their terrible visibility and turning circle, meaning you get in the way of farmers and locals on country roads. A discreet hatchback or estate can make your life easier if you don’t want to draw attention to yourself, but the GT is exotic enough to interest those in the know, yet in this colour and making this little noise, it’s subtle enough to pass under most radars.
What the McLaren doesn’t have is a terribly intuitive sat-nav system, so after leaving Aberystwyth I follow Saunders towards Llyn Brianne dam, where we think there’ll be the opportunity for a dramatic photograph. Cackett is meant to lead us, but he hares off, because the Golf is unable of going at anything other than Warp 10, but then he nearly runs out of fuel, so Saunders and I go in convoy along some single-track roads that are, to put it bluntly, atrocious.
They are not the ideal test of a McLaren, even this one, but with springing and damping that’s 15% softer than in a 570S and steering that’s two and a half rather than two turns between locks, you can make lovely, unruffled progress. Doubtless Saunders is feeling waftier and less involved in the E-Class, but the 570GT is sensationally smooth across poor surfaces yet has brilliant body control and composure, terrific steering and brakes and an engaging engine and gearshift. Plus enough space for a jacket.
As a piece of engineering, the McLaren is second only to one thing in this company – by which I mean the dam and reservoir at Llyn Brianne, a man-made lake that doesn’t occupy a vast acreage by Lake District standards but, because of the vast peaks and drops around you, is just as impressive. It’s up to 83 metres deep, holds 60 billion litres of water and houses turbines to power 6000 homes. Not even the McLaren generates that many kilowatts (although there’s precisely no chance of using all it does have), but as we start our next leg, there’s still no car I’d rather be in: the one that needs no added excitement.
LEG THREE - LLYN BRIANNE TO BETHLEHEM
There can’t be much farther to go: 40 or 50 miles, tops. But here, in remote, single-track Wales, distances don’t exactly fly past the side window quite like they might on a motorway. 

The road running south from Llyn Brianne isn’t numbered. It ducks and dives along the bank of the river Towy, through places that seem to exist only on the E-Class’s widescreen, high-definition sat-nav. Hamlets called things that you’d need to be a local, or perhaps a speaker of Elvish, to contemplate saying out loud – Ystradffin, Rhandirmwyn, Cilycwm, Minas Tirith – turn out, as we pass, to be little more than a farm or a terrace of cottages.


You seldom get much above 30mph on roads such as these. Sight lines are short and one of Carmarthenshire’s conveyances of choice – an Isuzu Rodeo or Mitsubishi L200 – is often to be found lurking on the far side of the next hedge. And yesterday’s storm has tossed a few pieces of the surrounding countryside onto the road – rocks, plenty of small and medium-sized branches, plus the odd firewood-grade bigger one.
Prior is claiming that all is fine in his lane-filling McLaren, but I reckon that’s the waterproof trousers talking. If I were him, it certainly wouldn’t take many bits of debris to swerve around, or run-ins with oncoming pick-up trucks, to make me wish I was driving something a bit less… vulnerable. The E350d Estate, by contrast, is so reassuringly versatile that you half expect to find a battery-operated chainsaw built into a boot compartment, perfect for clearing dead wood from your path should you need to.
At the outset, the other two thought I should apologise for bringing the Merc; it’s too boring, apparently. But now we’ve had a bit of Welsh weather – and one of my colleagues has apparently come close to spearing his Golf GTI into the undergrowth (I bet he didn’t write about that) while the other one nurses his front splitter with an air of concern – I think they’ve both become glad to have the Merc around. The E-Class has room for everybody and all of their gear, with space to spare. If it comes to it, ‘boring’ will ensure we all get home.

The E-Class is one of a handful of new cars I’ve driven this year that I could imagine owning. The E 350 d Estate does everything I’d ever really need of a family car, and do it with a rare and wonderfully enveloping blend of comfort, richness and luxury that happens to suit my purposes and tastes almost to the letter. The fact that it has also managed to keep up with a 300bhp hot hatchback and a 570bhp supercar these past 24 hours says plenty about its ability to sprint, grip and handle when the occasion calls for it.
At last: civilisation. Well, Llandovery, which is close enough. We refresh fuel tanks and stomachs and avail ourselves of the town’s estimable jet wash. Then we turn towards the Black Mountains and roads we know better than most of those on which we’ve been travelling so far, to round off our road trip with some suitably epic photography.
Never have white lines been a more welcome sight on the asphalt. The lanes here still aren’t wide, but at least there are two of them, and the path they take and visibility they grant allow us to throw off the constrained feel of the earlier afternoon’s motoring and press on.
Here, for the first time, the E-Class begins to feel its size and heft. Its air suspension begins to nudge gently against its bump stops over crests and through dips, and thus you become aware that you’ve reached the edge of its dynamic comfort zone. On these roads, I’m fairly sure neither Cackett nor Prior is getting the same messages. Right now, they’re definitely having more fun.

But would I swap with either of them? Are you kidding? Chuck in fibre optic broadband and a Netflix subscription and I’d move in here. With the prospect of a congested 200-mile motorway drive home at the end of a long couple of days, I’ll take the comfy seats, the 600-mile tank and the radar cruise control, thanks. Call me boring if you like.
Fifteen miles later, we’ve made it. As darkness descends, Bethlehem welcomes our weary, mucky, grateful caravan. We take a few moments to scout around for a barn big enough for three cars, a heavily pregnant woman, a donkey and some creative flash photography. But, just like Nasareth, it turns out that Bethlehem has yet to open its Christmas-themed tourist attraction. Oh well, I guess they’re everywhere else.
All that seems to matter is that we made it here – although, for the record, I’m not entirely sure all three of us would have done so without a three-pointed star to follow.
Nic Cackett, Matt Prior, Matt Saunders
A source: www.autocar.co.uk